Saturday, July 31, 2010

Liberal Courts

A judge appointed during the Clinton administration has stopped implementation of most of the important aspects of the Arizona immigration law. Of course. Go shopping for a liberal judge who thinks this is a bad law and then go to her to get it overturned. It's the same thing they did here in California for Prop 187 several years ago. It denied services to illegal aliens too, so the liberals found liberal judges to go against the will of the people and overturn the law. This is the same tactic that has been used time and time again. The people don't want this to happen, so the liberals, who know more than the people, will go to court and get the law changed. That's why liberal politicians always work to get liberals appointed to the courts. Liberal know that their positions can never be passed by a vote of the people. They know they are often political suicide for elected officials to vote on them. So they go to the courts and get their liberal agenda forced on us by the courts' that's the view from the Hysterical Right Wing.

Friday, July 30, 2010

Deport Them

: http://www.ice.gov/secure_communities/ There is a new program called secure communities to detect and deport illegal aliens. The Federal Government wants everyone booked into jail to have their fingerprints taken and then have those fingerprints checked by the Federal Government. The ones that belong to illegal aliens will be flagged and they will be deported. Only people who are arrested will be fingerprinted and deported. Naturally, the illegal alien apologists are spreading lies about the program. They are claiming that that this will spread fear and distrust of all law enforcement. They are saying that people who are here illegally will be reluctant to report crimes for fear of being caught up in this program and deported. There is so much wrong with that, that it is hard to know where to begin. First of all, people who report crimes will not be fingerprinted and will not be reported. Only people who are arrested will be fingerprinted. If illegal aliens are victims of crime then they have a choice, report the crime and risk deportation or don't report the crime. If they were not in this country, they would not have been victimized in the first place. They don't belong here and I don't care if they are afraid to use police services. I don't want anyone victimized, but I don't have much sympathy for people who are committing crimes just by being here; that's the view from the Hysterical Right Wing.

Thursday, July 29, 2010

Governement Service

When electing officials , perhaps we should vote on how much to pay them each time too? Elected officials vote to raise their own pay and benefits. How would you like a job where you determine your own pay and benefits? That's what your elected officials do today. Perhaps when we vote for mayor, or governor or congressman we should get to vote on how much we can pay them? Include a number of choices and then let the people determine who much they should get, with a minimum amount being minimum wage. The money should be determined in multiples of minimum wage. So twice minimum wage, five times, ten times, or even a hundred times minimum wage. I think that government service should be just that, service. No one should be elected to any office and expect to get rich, or to make it a career. All elected officials should be placed on Social Security as their only retirement. That serves several functions. First, it means that they can't let the system go bankrupt without hurting themselves. Second, it means that they don't get the extravagant pensions that career politicians get now. We need to break up the ruling class and service back in government service; that's the view from the Hysterical Right Wing.

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Election Reform

I think that you can't run for office if you hold an office. Not only should we have term limits, but we should not allow politicians to run for Senate while they still hold office as a Congressman. I also think that you can't run for office if it is during the time you were elected to another office, that is you can't resign or take a leave of absence to run for some other office if your term has not expired. John McCain was a sitting Senator. He should have resigned from the Senate to run for President. Sarah Palin was Governor of Alaska, she should have resigned as Governor to run for Vice-President. But under my plan, they should have simply served out their full terms of office and then ran for the next election. They keep their seats and run for higher office as a form of job insurance in case they don't win. This is a huge scandal and only serves those who are in office, it does not serve the people. Who is representing their constituents if the office holder is out running full time for another office? President Obama was a sitting Senator. He should have served out his term, then ran for President. Because he ran for and was elected President the people who elected him as Senator have had their vote for Senate taken away, and cut short. He made a promise to them to serve as Senator. He should have kept that promise. Now we even have had the scandal associated with his replacement. My plan would have eliminated these kinds of problems.

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

Support Colombia

Hugo Chavez Warns of US Oil Cutoff in Colombia Dispute Venezuela may be providing safe havens for rebels, terrorists and drug lords from Colombia. Colombia has been fighting along the border with Venezuela for years. The US has provided military and law enforcement aid for decades. The war has been going well, but it is difficult to win if the enemy has a safe haven nearby. Dictator Hugo Chavez has threatened the United States with the an oil embargo if Colombia invades Venezuela. Another tin horn dictator who threatens the worlds only super power. Once again the administration of President Obama talks tough, puts a nasty memo in their file and does nothing. Hugo Chavez is constantly threatening his neighbor and the US with revolution. He cozies up to the Russians and makes plans to export weapons to enemies of the USA. We should be working to overthrow his administration. We should support Colombia in any military action they need to take to protect themselves from rebels, terrorists and drug lords. If Hugo Chavez wants to cut off oil to the United States, then we should cut off all economic activity with Columbia, see how his people like eating oil. The US needs to do a better job of fighting the war on drugs here at home. That would cut off funding for the people who are fighting in Columbia. All the more reason we should be building nuclear power plants as quickly as we can; that's the view from the Hysterical Right Wing.

Monday, July 26, 2010

Rattle the Sword

North Korea Vows 'Nuclear' Response to US Drills in Sea of Japan A tiny tin horn dictator threatened the worlds only super power with a nuclear response to US Navy exercises in the Sea of Japan. If I were running the nation, I would double the number of ships and aircraft involved and sail up to within two feet of his territorial waters. He should tremble in his boots every time we rattle our swords. Rather, we let these little bullies kick sand in our face. When North Korea sank a South Korean ship with heavy loss of life, we should have wiped out his whole navy. I respect the rights of small nations, but they don't have the right to threaten, bully and murder without paying a price for it. Great nations need to act like great nations or they will cease to be great. There is no point in having a huge military force if you won't use it to protect your interests or those of your friends. There was a time when we were called a paper tiger. A paper tiger looks fierce but is harmless. Under the leadership of President Obama, we are becoming a paper tiger again. We don't have enough troops in Afghanistan. We are pulling out of Afghanistan and Iraq too soon. We are not protecting our friends in South Korea. We need to spend less on bailing out the president's friends and more on national defense; that's the view from the Hysterical Right Wing.

Sunday, July 25, 2010

Captain America

Captain America: Not A Flag Waver?! In the comic books Captain America was a soldier in the US Army in the Second World War. He was subjected to experiments and became a super soldier. Because his character was also a super patriot, he chose to attire himself in a uniform based in color and design on the American flag. Fans of the comic book enjoyed the fact that Captain America has been a loyal American patriot, fighting the enemies of his nation in WWII. Now Hollywood has determined that they need to make a movie out of Captain America. They have also decided that he should not be a super patriot and a flag waver. They just know that this new version of Captain America will be popular with the fans. One of the reasons that remakes and movies of TV shows, comics and books are so popular is that there is an assumption that there is a built in fan base for the story. People like Captain America comic books so lets make a movie about Captain America. Hollywood is never content with leaving well enough alone. Rather than simply build upon characters and situations that have been popular for decades, they always seem to feel the need to change the situation around to the point where they are often unrecognizable. The recent Lost in Space and Planet of the Apes movies were good examples of this phenomena. Change the original so much in the movie version that it is almost unrecognizable. Hollywood has few new ideas of their own so they take the ideas of others. They then change those ideas to the point that the very people they want to reach, the fans of the original TV show or book don't like the movie they make. I suspect that Captain America will be another unrecognizable flop. After all, who in America during a time of war would want movies about characters who love America and wave the flag; that's the view from the Hysterical Right Wing.

Saturday, July 24, 2010

Prisoners

5 US Troops Killed in Afghanistan, 2 Captured by Taliban Two US Army troops have been captured by the Taliban in Afghanistan. If President Bush were still in power or of John McCain had been elected the main stream media would be all over this story. As President Obama is in office and the media loves his liberal administration, then don't expect to hear any more about it. Already AOL news had it as a smaller caption, rather than a major headline. The main stream media would have presented the wife of the soldiers, their parents would appear sobbing and pleading with the President to "do something" about the capture of their sons. Every day would see a new story about one of these men about their dreams cut short in the illegal, immoral, unethical war in Afghanistan being waged for oil and big business profits. Their high school basketball coach and their third grade math teachers would all parade past the cameras to tell us how insensitive the President is to their plight. We won't get any of that with President Obama in office. I favor the War Against Islamic Extremists. I know that it will mean that Americans will have to give their lives to defend this nation. I know that these soldiers will almost certainly be subject to barbaric treatment, real torture and perhaps even beheading at the hands of their captors who care nothing for humanity or the Geneva Conventions. It is the price we as a free nation must pay to avoid more 9/11 type attacks. Our own media don't care or don't understand that. I pray for these soldiers and I hope they can be rescued from the evil clutches of our enemies; that's the view from the Hysterical Right Wing.

Friday, July 23, 2010

Space Rockets, Ho!

Astronauts4Hire When I was a kid in the late 1950's and 1960's we had hope for change. We were looking forward to the world of the Jetsons. Flying cars, space stations, travel to Mars, colonies on the Moon. This is the world the US Government should be trying to create for use. These projects create jobs, and infrastructure. In the long term they benefit the nation far more than simply giving transfer payments to people to sit home on the couch and watch television. The Lewis and Clark Corps of Discovery was sent west to survey and explore the western territories purchased from the French. That was almost two hundred years ago. A hundred and fifty years ago Custer lead expeditions into Indian Territory to explore land for possible settlement. Our space program should function in a manner similar to those expeditions. They should go into space to blaze trails so that private individuals and private companies can follow and reap the benefits and profits of living and working in space and other heavenly bodies. Just as the trappers, cattlemen and settlers moved west, the adventurers, tourists, and manufacturers must move into space. It will keep our nation vital and moving ahead. While I thing we need international cooperation to do some of these things, we don't need to tie ourselves to foolish treaties that make everything produced our found in space to be the common heritage of mankind. If people from other nations want to exploit the Moon or Mars, then let them do so, either in direct competition with us or in cooperation with us; but we should not have to be taxed by international bodies that have no real representation for Americans. Ventures into space will never be common until they are profitable; that's the view from the Hysterical Right Wing.

Thursday, July 22, 2010

North Korea

U.S. Spy Chief-nominee Warns of More North Korean Attacks : Homeland Security News The nominee for an intelligence position has said that he expects the North Koreans will continue to attack the South Koreans. The US and South Korea have scheduled maneuvers in the area soon as a show of strength to the North Koreans. I submit that it is not a show of strength, it is a show of weakness. The North Koreans sank a South Korean ship and killed 47 sailors. So we will show them, we are going to sail around in the ocean near by. That will teach them how we respond to murder and piracy. We also put a nasty memo in their file too. China prevented the UN from taking any action. So the Red Chinese and the North Koreans have held off the South Koreans and the Americans from any effective action against North Korea. Our intelligence sources tell us that North Korea will continue offensive action against us. We need to come up with a substantially better response than denouncing North Korea in the UN, and sailing ships around that are not going to do anything is pointless. It will not change North Korean behavior; that's the view from the Hysterical Right Wing.

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

Stay

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/07/10/gen-casey-america-may-be-in-iraq-and-afghanistan-for-another-decade/?fbid=lKY26Duw22Z A US General has said that we will have troops in Iraq and Afghanistan for at least the next ten years. Who is surprised by that? I certainly am not shocked. When are the troops coming home from Germany? We won that war in 1945 and yet thousands of troops are still there. How about the troops in Korea? When are they coming home? The troops in Korea are facing an enemy, ready to attack at any time. An enemy that may even have nuclear weapons ready to be put on missiles. That war ended over 50 years ago! I have no problem with American troops being in Iraq and Afghanistan for the next fifty years or more if necessary for the security of the American people. That is the whole point to having a military and to have sent them to those nations in the first place. We need to stay there as long as it takes; that's the view from the Hysterical Right Wing.

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

Lybian Lawfare

Obama, British PM: Lockerbie Bomber Release Not BP's Doing Agents of Libya were sent to the UK to attack an American airliner. They set off a bomb and killed hundreds of people, and bankrupted Pan Am airlines. It was one of the worst terrorists attacks in American history. One of the bombers was captured and sent to prison in Scotland. He was supposed to serve life in prison. The criminal and Libya claimed he was very sick and had only a couple months to live. The Scottish criminal justice system showing more compassion than common sense let the criminal out of prison to go home to Libya to die. He had only three months to live, they said. Naturally, he was given a hero's welcome when he returned and made the West look weak and stupid in the eyes of the Libyan public. Now that he is safely at home and the three months are long past, they now say he could live as long as ten more years. Then years, not three months. What a surprise. The Libyans played the West for fools. They destroy one of our airliners, kill hundreds of people, then stall for years rather than extradite the terrorists. We finally get the evil bomber in prison, and the Libyans manage to use our laws and our concepts of Christian mercy against us to get the terrorist out of prison. The Muslim Extremists have used Lawfare to win another victory against the West. Muslim Extremists using our own laws and our own values to defeat us, that's the view from the Hysterical Right Wing.

Monday, July 19, 2010

Shria Law, USA?

Christians' arrest: 1st step to placate Muslims (OneNewsNow.com) Part of the Christian religion is the Great Commission. Matthew, Chapter 28, verse 19, Jesus says "Go ye therefor and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost" Under Sharia Law the preaching of any religion other than Islam is a crime. Now in the United State, police seem to be enforcing Sharia Law, in violation of American law. There is a Arab Festival every year in Dearborn, Michigan. Naturally, most of the people who attend are Muslims. For Christians who want to obey the works of Christ and follow the Great Commission it would seem a great opportunity to witness to non-Christians. In the last several years, Christians have been attending the festival, which is held on public streets, and passed out Christian literature in English and Arabic. They are not aggressive, they simply stand on a public street and present their leaflets to those who pass by them. Perhaps they make a quick mention of Jesus or other witness. They don't use loudspeakers, they are not on private property, they are not blocking the sidewalks. Last year they distributed leaflets inside the festival and they were confronted by security, members of the crowd and eventually police. This year they distributed leaflets outside the festival and were confronted by a large number of police. The police ordered them not to preach the Word of God within many blocks of the Arab Festival. This is a dangerous precedent to happen in America; that's the view from the Hysterical Right Wing.

Sunday, July 18, 2010

K9 Cannibals

Is There Dog Meat in Dog Food? I have been told for years that some dog foods have dog meat in them. Figuring this was an urban legend, I checked and apparently it is legal in the USA and in California for companies to use dog meat in dog food. And apparently, companies are going to the dog pound and picking up the carcasses of dead dogs and turning them into dog food. While I have no problem with the bodies of dead dogs being used as food products, I do have a problem with them being used for feeding domestic dogs. One of the reasons we got Mad Cow Disease was ranchers were feeding the bodies, particularly the brains, of dead cows to living cows. That is wrong on so many levels. Cows are vegetarians and probably should not be fed any significant amount of meat. The main problem I have is that animals should not be fed their own kind to eat. While it may be a dog eat dog world, we should not encourage it. Dogs should not be fed dogs as part of their meal. We don't know what long term problems this may cause our canine friends and helpers. Dogs provide great service and companionship to man and we should not repay that service by making dogs eat each other. It should be illegal, at the Federal level, for any animal to be fed it's own kind; that's the view from the Hysterical Right Wing.

Saturday, July 17, 2010

Red Light Scameras

Red light cameras are all about the revenue. There have even been instances that cities will adjust the camera, red lights and particularly the yellow light timing to gain more revenue when a camera's income slows down. I am glad if they make some people slow down and drive safer but these are an affront to our civil liberties and we should not permit them to spread. The real owner of the vehicle is often long gone when you are dealing with people who don't register their cars, have car insurance or even drivers licenses. People without drivers licenses and who drive while impaired are the largest sources of traffic collisions. They are who we should be going after. Even the Governor of California has proposed adding radar and writing speeding tickets using the existing red light cameras, not as a way to slow cars down, but rather as a way to raise revenue when the State and many cities are broke. So the average person who obeys the law and registers their car has a vehicle get a red light ticket and they are cited. The criminal who drives drunk or on drugs, who does not register his vehicle or who has a car load of drugs, simply gets away as the mail goes to someone else or is returned to the red light camera company. Red light cameras have very little to do with safety, but they have a lot to do with raising money while city governments don't have to raise taxes; that's the view from the Hysterical Right Wing.

Friday, July 16, 2010

Early Release

http://www.contracostatimes.com/california/ci_15522902?nclick_check=1 In California our Democratic controlled legislature has so mis-managed the richest state in the nation with the highest taxes in the country that they don't even have enough money to keep the prisoners in prison. They determined that to safe money they would release a few non-violent offenders who could be safely released. In my mind, that would be someone who may have participated in check fraud or perhaps identity theft. Perhaps someone who steals cars or runs a chop shop. Nothing violent or confrontational. Recently the Los Angeles Police attempted to stop a car that then ran from them. After a short chase, the driver exited and started shooting at the police. The police officers rightly returned fire and the suspect was killed. As part of the investigation they determined that the man who attacked them had just been released from California state prison as part of the early release program. The criminal had been in prison for a drug offense and vehicle theft. Those are non-violent crimes. He also had been convicted of possession of a gun and a silencer as well as evading the police. Someone who runs from the police may not be overtly violent, but certainly does not respect the law. Often, that means a car chase where many lives are endangered. Generally, the only reason to have a gun with a silencer is to murder someone without others being aware of the murder. Hardly what we were promised by the Democrats in Sacramento; that's the view from the Hysterical Right Wing.

Thursday, July 15, 2010

2nd Amendment

http://www.nationalgunrights.org/ There are many organizations working to protect our gun rights. Despite the President and most other Democrats who want to take all guns away from law abiding people, they are making progress. In recent Supreme Court decisions, the courts have ruled that the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution applies to the States as well as the Federal government. This has had the effect of invalidated many of the local and state gun laws that have illegally infringed upon our freedoms for decades. The Second Amendment was written to insure that the people would be able to over throw an oppressive government. Our Founding Fathers used their privately owned firearms to over throw the English king and his army. Students of history know that every nation will eventually suffer invasion, riots, and often oppression. Only by having the right to self defense coupled with the right to own the necessary weapons to procure that defense can the people keep themselves safe and free. During the Second World War, we were worried that the Japanese might invade the West Coast of the United States. Private citizens used their private arms to defend the Western States against invasion. During riots here in California private citizens used their privately owned firearms to defend their lives, homes and businesses. But in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, the local government tried to disarm lawful, peaceful citizens. Armed police broke into peoples homes and stole their guns from them. The Supreme Court has shown that their actions were wrong; that's the view from the Hysterical Right Wing.

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Say No To Kagan

PLEASE SELECT HERE, SIGN PETITION, AND WE'LL AUTOMATICALLY FAX YOUR PERSONALIZED PETITION TO ALL 100 U.S. SENATORS, OPPOSING ELENA KAGAN, LIBERAL EXTREMIST JUDGE TO THE SUPREME COURT President Obama has nominated Elena Kagan, to be a justice on the Supreme Court of the United States. She is so outside the main stream of the American people that she should not be confirmed as a justice. CBS has reported that she is a lesbian. Does a homosexual woman represent the views of the average American? While at Harvard University, she tried to ban the military from recruiting on the campus. In a time of war, she sided with our enemies and tried to prevent adults from listening to military recruiters. The same type of liberal that screams about freedom of expression, but when adults want to talk to a military recruiter, suddenly she knows better and prevents them from talking to recruiters. Like so many liberals, she does not profess a faith in God. Rather she looks to religion as a way to prevent women from having abortion. Like so many liberals, particularly homosexual liberals, it's all about sex. Can't have the military recruit on campus because the military does not want homosexual behavior by it's troops. Can't be religious, because it condemns homosexual behavior. This is not the type of person we need on the Supreme court. She will not interpret the law, she will make the law to suit her own out of the mainstream views; that's the view from the Hysterical Right Wing.

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

No Extradition

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Roman-Polanski/2010/07/12/id/364344-- Roman Polanski was convicted in US court by having sex with a thirteen year old girl. The Swiss have denied extradition of him. They claim that the US prosecutors office did not share enough information with the Swiss for them to decide in their favor. The US prosecutors need to do what they have to in order for this criminal to be returned. Hollywood people too often think they can perform any act of crime or evil and get away with it, this is one of those cases. He needs to be brought to justice. Every day that he is free sends the same message. If you are rich or famous you can escape justice. Even if you commit an unspeakable crime against a child. This crime was not a mistake. It was not in the heat of passion. It was not a case of the girl looked to be 19 years old. This criminal drugged the girl and had sex with her. Premeditation and planning went into the crime. He knew full well how young she was a the time of the crime. This criminal should not be the toast of Hollywood, he should be in jail; that's the view from the Hysterical Right Wing.

Monday, July 12, 2010

Bad Appointment

Is Obama Appointee Harry Knox an 'Anti-Catholic Bigot'? -- Politics Daily President Obama has appointed an openly homosexual man to head the Advisory Council on Faith-based and Neighborhood Partnerships. The concern is that as someone who is openly homosexual the nature of his relationship with the Roman Catholic Church and other conservative religious groups will make it impossible to properly perform his work. Most traditional religions, those that represent at least half of all Americans, teach that homosexual behavior is against the laws of God. By appointing someone who openly disagrees with the teaching of a large number of those citizens he is supposed to serve, the President has shown that he does not care about serving the people of the United States, unless they share his ideology. The President should always appoint the best people for the job. The ability to get along with the citizens you are supposed to serve is certainly an important part of that. This appointment is very much like what President Obama often does, he does not want to get along with conservatives, he wants to just give orders and expect us to live with it. That's not how our system works; that's the view from the Hysterical Right Wing.

Sunday, July 11, 2010

Why Do They Kill Us?

Why Do Muslims Murder Americans? I have heard several on the left claim that Muslims have only murdered Americans since President Johnson moved the US closer to Israel in the last 1960's. This quite naturally, is simply a lie. Radical Muslims murder Americans because they are Radical Muslims and that's what they do; they murder everyone who is not like them. It is what Islam has done since the Religion of Peace began to spread Islam by the sword over a thousand years ago. In the very earliest years of the Republic Muslims were hijacking American ships on the high seas, kidnapping our citizens and murdering those who opposed them. It was only military action that stopped this rampage of the Barbary Pirates, who may have taken as many as a million Americans and Europeans as slaves. Naturally our history books gloss over the part about them being Radical Muslims. Radical Islam is at war with the West and all non-Muslim nations and peoples. That is what they tell us in their websites, newspapers, and video proclamations. We simply choose to ignore what they tell use and look for ways to blame ourselves. We failed to build enough schools in Saudi Arabia or did not open enough hospitals in Afghanistan. Of course, only radical Muslim schools can operate in Muslim nations and under the Taliban medicine was practiced as if it were a thousand years ago, but the liberals say it's our fault Radical Muslims murder Americans; but that's not the view form the Hysterical Right Wing.

Saturday, July 10, 2010

Cruise Missile Cruise

U.S. Tomahawk Missiles Deployed Near China Send Message - Yahoo! News The US Navy has deployed three nuclear tomahawk missile submarines near China. They carry dozens of special operations troops and hundreds of cruise missiles. I suspect the message they carry is not so much to China, but to China to pass along to North Korea. China is just about the only nation that has any leverage with North Korea. The isolated nation of North Korea does not permit communication with the outside world. They control every aspect of the lives of their people. North Korea is a rogue nation that counterfeits US dollars because they have not hard currency of their own for trade. They produce almost nothing and yet they invest nearly all their skills in making nuclear weapons and missiles to deliver them. Our main stream media simply ignores them while the North Koreans violate the sovereignty of South Korea by unprovoked attacks on their ships. At least our Navy is doing a little sabre rattling. I would have been happier if they had launched a few hundred of those missiles at the North Korean missile sites, nuclear sites, and command and control sites. It's really the only way we are likely to stop their nuclear weapons development; that's the view from the Hysterical Right Wing.

Friday, July 9, 2010

Criminal, Not Hero

Barefoot Bandit Colton Harris-Moore's Mom Pam Kohler: 'I Think It's Kind of Neat' A criminal has stolen from dozens, perhaps hundreds of victims and his mothers comment is that she thinks it's kind of neat. I think that is a loathsome thing to say and shows tremendous disrespect for the law and the suffering of her son's victims. No wonder he has become a career criminal. There are even websites that brag about how wonderful he is, simply because he has not physically hurt anyone. Perhaps he has simply not been cornered yet. If I work for ten years and save enough to buy and airplane and this criminal steals that airplane and crashes it, he has hurt me by taking those years of work away from me. When people suffer a lose from theft, it is as if the criminal has stolen the hours or months of time it took the victim to earn the money to buy those items. I don't think people should work hard, only to see the fruits of their labors stolen by some criminal. As a police officer I have seen the despair and tragedy caused by criminals who think they have a right to other peoples property. Society should not glamorize this criminal. He is violating one of the Ten Commandments, Thou Shalt Not Steal, and he is violating the laws of our land. He is a terrible role model for our youth and is contributing nothing from our society, only taking from it. I long for the day when he is captured, convicted and sentenced to prison, where he belongs; that' the view from the Hysterical Right Wing.

Thursday, July 8, 2010

Two Fathers

Obama's 'two fathers' reference inappropriate (OneNewsNow.com) President Obama uses every opportunity to force the homosexual agenda on Americans. When he made a Fathers Day speech he used the term "two fathers." Children should have one father, one mother, who are lawfully married to each other. That is the ideal home. Both a mother and a father will pass on the uniqueness of male and female role models to their children. Both are important for the proper and normal development of children. While other family models exist, we need to strive for excellence, normality and traditional values. We know these work, and work well to raise our children to be happy, healthy and productive members of our society. While no couple is perfect, it is more difficult to raise children when the family unit itself is imperfect. The President should always strive to provide role models for the nation. He cannot do that by making speeches that attempt to redefine marriage into something that it is not. Marriage is between a man and a woman. It has always been that way in the United States and the people are not willing to change that basic building block of society. If a child does have two fathers, it should be the man married to their mother and our Father, which art in heaven; that's the view from the Hysterical Right Wing.

Wednesday, July 7, 2010

Defeat the Empire of Islam

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/07/02/controvery-surrounds-construction-mosques/ We must use the presence of Muslims in free nations as an opportunity, rather than a problem. If life gives you lemons, make lemonade. If God gives you Muslims, make Christians. We Christians can't speak the truth of Christ in Islamic nations, they won't let us preach, build churches or allow Muslims to convert from Islam. When they come here, the shoe is on the other foot. We can approach Muslims all the time and speak the word of Christ to them. Every Mosque should have a Christian center built across the street or next door to it. It should specialize in the conversion of Muslims to Christianity. It should be an in your face, Islam is the work of the devil and you need to repent and come to Jesus place, with no holds barred. It should make clear the words of Christ himself who said "no one comes to the father except though me." Islam says that the New and Old Testaments are holy books from God as is the Koran. Then they must read the New Testament and see that the Koran is false. Once we have gotten a fair number of Muslim converts, then we must recruit them to go back to their home nation and preach the word of God, even under the penalty of death and become martyrs if necessary. That's how the Christians defeated the Roman empire and that's how we defeat the Islamic empire too, that's the view from the Hysterical Right Wing.

Tuesday, July 6, 2010

Keep Marijuana Illegal

Minister Speaks Out Against California NAACP's Support Of Proposition 19 - TheStreet Many Black Americans have been arrested because of their use of marijuana. As result of this problem, the National Association of Colored People has come out in support of California's Proposition 19. That proposition will legalize marijuana in California. The NAACP has said that because Blacks make up less than 10% of the population but over 20% of the marijuana arrests, the fact that marijuana is illegal has a disproportionate effect on Blacks. Perhaps we can study all the laws and their enforcement and if we find that one group or another are disproportionately arrested, we could simply eliminate the law so that we can avoid the appearance of discrimination. There is just so much wrong with that idea. Nearly every law is violated by people in percentages that don't reflect the percentage of the population. Blacks might use marijuana more frequently than Whites, and Whites might use cocaine more frequently than Blacks. That does not mean we should make either of those activities legal, especially because of some race based analysis. Marijuana tax revenue will not be large enough to have a significant impact on our state budget crisis. The proponents say it may give us one or even two billion dollars per year in taxes. With a budget shortfall of over sixteen billion dollars, one or two billion will not make things any better. Marijuana legalization will make marijuana use more common, that will lead to more traffic and industrial accidents, as well as more crimes due to marijuana impairment. The law will not decrease the number of people in our jails or prisons, it will only change the nature of their offenses; that's the view from the Hysterical Right Wing.

Monday, July 5, 2010

Drug Lords & Drug Abuse

http://www.policemag.com/Blog/Gangs/Story/2010/06/None-Dare-Call-It-Terrorism.aspx Mexican drug lords are terrorizing our border communities. In 1916 Mexico was in the midst of a revolution and some of the banditry spilled over into the US border regions. It got so bad that President Wilson sent the US Army, Pershing Punitive Expedition into Mexico to track down and destroy Pancho Villa and his army of bandits and revolutionaries. How many Americans must die in this drug war before we get serious about fighting it? Americans are killed, perhaps every day, by illegal aliens who are invading our nation. Our police are attacked and killed by illegal aliens. Large regions of our border are no longer safe to the point where we are actually advising American to avoid visiting parts of America because the drug lords have so many smugglers and enforcers there that it is just too dangerous. We need to tighten our drug laws so that being under the influence of an illegal drug is a criminal offense, punishable by a long prison term. We need to make possession of even small amounts of illegal drugs an offense that leads to a very large fine, particularly to second and third offenses. If you take someones car because they have a little marijuana in it, they will be less willing to have marijuana in their next automobile. It is the demand for illegal drugs by the users that creates this entire problem. We need to stop people from using drugs. Hollywood needs to stop glamorizing drug kingpins and drug use. We need to show the real face of drug abuse is not glamorous, it is painful, and terrible. Prostitution, burglary, robbery, disease and death are what wait for most long term hard drug users. That is the story that needs to be told; that's the view from the Hysterical Right Wing.

Sunday, July 4, 2010

Five Year Olds & Condoms

Massachusetts Elementary School to Distribute Condoms to Students - ParentDish Well, there it is, the liberal have finally gotten their wish. Forty years ago the liberal Supreme Court of the United States took Christan prayer out of the public schools. It has been there since the beginning of the Republic. Everyone knew it was the desire of the founders and the majority of the public to have America as a Christian nation. To teach Christian values in the schools. Now that's gone and the new religion of Secular Humanism and Relative Ethics has replaced Christianity. If it feels good, do it. Children are going to do it no matter what you do, so you may as well let them. If you can't be with the one you love, love the one you are with. All you need is love. Don't let the children bring a Bible to school. Don't let them have Bible study at school. Don't let them pray in school. This is way the schools don't want home schooling and why they want the government to regulate private schools out of existence. They want to force feed their liberal agenda to all the children. Rather, distribute condoms to five year old children. Despite the fact that if children use condoms for their intended purpose, they are breaking the law. Children are by law not legally able to give consent to have sex, not with each other, not with adults, not with their teacher. Despite this, the state is giving away condoms to school children. I am quite certain the average parent in these school does not want their children to be given condoms. I am equally certain that the courts and the school district don't care at all what the parents want; that's the view from the Hysterical Right Wing.

Saturday, July 3, 2010

SCOTUS & Guns

http://www.aolnews.com/nation/article/supreme-court-extends-gun-owner-rights-nationwide/19533599 The Supreme Court of the United States has said that the right to keep and bear arms applies to the states, not just the Federal Government. This is only common sense. If it did not apply to the states the right to keep and bear arms would have been meaningless. It is clear from reading the papers of the founders that the ownership of guns by the people was their intent. They all spoke of the people retaining their ability to defend themselves, their families, their communities, with their own arms. It is my hope that state and particularly local firearms laws all over the nation will be repealed or invalidated in courts. People need to be able to purchase, own and carry military light small arms just as the people did in the time of the founders. Certainly reasonable regulations to prohibit felons, drug users and various criminals should be in effect to prevent them from having weapons. No one doubts that, but good, upstanding, honest people should be able to defend themselves. There are many states, most states in fact, that permit honest people to carry concealed weapons. There have not been significant numbers of incidents involving those who legally carry weapons. The presence of law abiding people with guns has actually reduced crime. Criminals fear people who have guns, and that is how it should be, the criminals should fear the law abiding; that's the view from the Hysterical Right Wing.

Friday, July 2, 2010

Anglican Church in America

The continuing churches of the Traditional Anglican Communion are considering joining an Ordinariate of the Roman Catholic Church. Here is my response to that consideration: A reading from the 31st Chapter of the Book of Jeremiah, beginning at the 8th verse: “Behold, I will bring them from the north country, and gather them from the coasts of the earth, and with them the blind and the lame, the woman with child and her that travaileth with child together: a great company shall return thither.” Centuries ago, Anglicans were in communion with the Roman Catholic Church. I believe that God wants us to come together and be in communion with them again. I also believe that He wants us all to go together, not as small groups, and not leave anyone behind who wants to come with us. The TAC and the ACA took us in and gave us the word of God at a time when we were not hearing it at our previous church. Now we are being asked to join an Ordinariate as part of the Roman Catholic Church. Our Bishops have signed the Roman Catholic Catechism. The Bishops are the defenders of the faith. So our Bishops, by signing that document have told us there is no theological barrier to communion with Rome. So where is the problem? The most important issue is that we must be permitted to take all of our people who want to go, with us if we move. Some of our parishioners can take communion at our churches, but cannot take communion at Roman Catholic Churches. Some of our parishioners are divorced, if they choose to go to the Ordinariate, will they be permitted to continue taking communion? If they cannot go to Rome without giving up communion, then we should not abandon them. Some of our parishioners are former Roman Catholics. They left Rome because they married someone who was not Roman Catholic. They left Rome because of abuses in the Church. They left Rome for any number of reasons, but now they may be willing to return. They take communion with us, but they typically are denied communion in Roman Catholic Churches. If they cannot go to Rome without giving up communion then we should not abandon them. Some of our parishioners are both divorced and former Roman Catholics. They may be willing to return to Rome. They take communion with us, if they cannot take communion in a Roman Catholic Ordinariate, then we should not abandon them. Some of our clergy are divorced. Some of our clergy are former Roman Catholics. Some of our clergy are divorced former Roman Catholics. If they want to go to the Roman Catholic Church with us, they should be permitted to go with us, and they should be permitted to continue to function in a clerical role. While I understand that due to various reasons, they may not be able to function exactly as they do now, if they are willing to join the Roman Catholic Church, they should be permitted to continue to administer the sacraments as they do now in a position similar to the one they now hold. If they cannot go to Rome without giving up consecrating the communion, then we should not abandon them. There are other concerns too. Practices that we do not share with the Roman Catholic Church that make us distinctly Anglican that we should continue if we can. Practices that make us unique and practices that I would not like to give up, but are not anywhere near as important as taking all those with us who want to go to the Roman Catholic Church. Each parish owns its own church property. I think each parish should retain its property. It helps to insulate the parish from lawsuits and other decisions that may negatively affect the parish that happen on a regional or national level. Each parish has a vestry that helps determine who their priest will be and how much he will be compensated. I think this process, along with the individual ownership of the property would have helped the Roman Catholic Church avoid some of their scandals they have endured in recent decades. The vestry is very close to their priest and more so then even the bishop they may know his suitability for that parish. Our priests are allowed to marry, and even divorce and stay on as members of the clergy. While divorce is not a good thing, I understand that sometimes it is the path that people need to choose. I think our clergy should retain these rights as well, if we move to the Roman Catholic Church. The 1928 Book of Common Prayer and the Anglican Missal are wonderful books. The prayers in those books are beautiful and many of us have prayed those books for our entire lives. It is a dear and cherished part of our Anglican identity. I would like to think we can take those treasured books with us if we go to the Roman Catholic Church. I would be willing to give up all of our practices in order to achieve one holy Catholic Church, if I knew we could take all our people with us who want to go to the Roman Catholic Church. If they could all still receive communion together, consecrated by the same clergy in the Roman Church then we should go to the new Ordinariate. If we must leave behind members of our parishes, or if we must leave behind members of our clergy, then we must not go, we must not leave anyone behind anyone who now either receives or administers the communion at our churches, not “the blind and the lame, the woman with child and her that travaileth with child.”

Thursday, July 1, 2010

Religion of Intolerance

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/InfidelsAreCool/~3/hHfMoRMdUkI/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email A college professor in Pakistan has been beaten for his refusal to convert from being a Christian to a Muslim. A group of students attacked the professor on the college campus because he was a Christian. Despite his pleas for help, no one came to assist him except his wife. She was also beaten down for her trouble. The religion of peace is the religion of intolerance and violence. This certain does show once again that it is not education that will make the difference in making Muslims more peaceful. These are college students on a college campus. These are not some ignorant, poor tribesmen in some far off village. The liberal mainstream media too frequently tries to tell us that people turn to radical Islam because they are poor. This is false, people turn to radical Islam from all walks of life and social structure. The UK was recently attacked by terrorist who were not only radical Muslims, but medical doctors as well. The people building nuclear weapons for Iran are certainly not some ignorant tribesmen who don't know any better. Nuclear scientist are the epitome of learned men, and yet they are found among those who profess radical Islam. We need to wake up in the West and realize the real dangers that radical Islam poses to our way of life, that's the view from the Hysterical Right Wing.